Close this search box.
Muslims Down Under Logo

Fatima Payman: Mascot, Menace or Member of Parliament?

Benedict Moleta

Views expressed in this piece are the writers own views
and do not represent that of the Editorial Board

blog Fatima Payman: Mascot, Menace or Member of Parliament?

In parliament for only two years, Western Australian Labor Senator Fatima Payman has received substantial attention, in the chamber and in the media. Payman received attention after her first Senate speech in September 2022. And she has received attention in May and June this year, for the views she has expressed on the Hamas-Israel war, and her own government’s position on Palestinian statehood. But this attention has been selective and subjective, rather than considering her work as a federal parliamentarian more broadly and objectively.

Payman’s public reception recalls the title of political scientist Mahmood Mamdani’s book Good Muslim, Bad Muslim. Her first Senate speech was received with varieties of admiration and affection, in parliament and online. Attention was paid to her appearance and biography, and primarily to the fact she was a young hijab-wearing woman – almost as though she were considered a sort of multicultural Muslim mascot for the Labor Party.

Now in 2024, Payman has been taken seriously, by both her prime minister and members of the opposition, as something like a mildly disruptive Muslim menace.

Why does Payman’s public conduct seem to stimulate affection and apprehension more readily than temperate intellectual engagement?

In 2022 Payman was liked; a young and articulate hijab-wearing woman, the child of Afghan refugees, whose first parliamentary speech contained many hopeful messages about an Australia in which diversity need not be only a source of smiling photo opportunities. The speech drew to a close with language that might strike sympathetic ears as guileless and good, and sceptical ears as youthful or idealistic:

“Let us not settle on multiculturalism being just a brand we associate with or take pride in as a nation but rather fully embrace it by caring for one another, accepting each other for who we are and what we can become, and ensuring all voices are heard at the table.”

Payman’s wishes were consonant with the Albanese government’s “Multicultural Framework Review,” launched in June 2023. Announcing the initiative, Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs Andrew Giles portrayed it as distinctively Labor, in both short-term redress and long-term vision. Addressing implied Coalition failures, he said: “The Albanese Labor Government is turning the page on nine shameful years of fearmongering and division surrounding multicultural Australians. This review is a concrete step towards an inclusive country where we are able to harness the talents of all Australians.”

And drawing on a longer Labor tradition Giles was pleased to note that: “The Review coincides with the 50th anniversary of the Whitlam Government’s 1973 report ‘A Multi-cultural Society for the Future’, which marked the birth of contemporary multicultural Australia.”

There was heartening reciprocity between this Multicultural Framework Review and Payman’s first-person advocacy of productive multiculturalism in her first Senate speech. This dialectic of policy and personal spheres also seemed to be reflected more broadly in the Labor government elected in 2022. Payman became part of a new Albanese government in which women held 10 of 23 cabinet portfolios, and the presence of Aboriginal and Muslim ministers contributed to notable diversity. The young Western Australian Senator was not a powerful player in this new government, but she was a good public Muslim and perhaps one who might, in time, graduate from the multicultural sidelines to the ministerial main game.

But in May 2024, Payman has instead graduated from good Muslim to bad Muslim.

Minister Giles had noted with pride that Labor’s new multicultural initiative comes on the fiftieth anniversary of Whitlam’s initiative in 1973. But 1973 was also the year of the Yom Kippur War, initiated on October 6 when Egypt and Syria simultaneously attacked Israel. Fifty years later it is the reality of war between Hamas and Israel – rather than a half-century renewal of multiculturalist aspirations – that has now prompted Payman to earnestly connect her own convictions to public and political discourse. By using the term genocide in a speech to the media outside Parliament House, and by concluding with the slogan “From the river to the sea Palestine will be free,” Payman became a Muslim nuisance for Labor and apparently a Muslim menace to parliament.

Labor and Coalition Senators quickly voted together in a majority of 56-12 to condemn the use of the controversial slogan. Prime Minister Albanese described Payman as a young senator from Western Australia whose expression of views wasinappropriate,” and emphasised that “we speak for the Government’s policy and the Government’s policy has been very clear on Labor’s opposition to the terrorist attack by Hamas, and on matters pertaining to a possible ceasefire, release of hostages, humanitarian aid and Israel’s ground offensive in Rafah. Liberal Senator and Shadow Attorney General Michaelia Cash pressed Foreign Minister Penny Wong to tell the Senate whether or not Payman had been reprimanded for her use of the pro-Palestinian slogan, and National Party leader David Littleproud suggested that the Prime Minister should remove Payman from the Labor Party and that his response to her statements was a test of his leadership, saying “If he had the courage of his conviction, he would walk in there and he would expel her from the Labor Party.

But while the Prime Minister and senior members of the opposition were united in their admonition of Payman, Jewish advocacy groups did not uniformly find her conduct controversial.

Alex Ryvchin, Co-CEO of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry strongly criticised Payman, suggesting that “If she can’t refrain from using racist slogans at a time of extreme tension in our society, she should consider her position.” 

In contrast, Max Kaiser, Executive Officer of the Jewish Council of Australia, told SBS News that “The Jewish Council of Australia sends Fatima Payman a big mazel tov (expression of congratulations) for her courage in breaking with the party line,” and suggested, “It should not be controversial to use this terminology as it is in line with the finding of the International Court of Justice that Israel’s actions constitute a plausible genocide.”

Payman’s mixing of personal views with public commentary drew further criticism after she called upon her government to recognize a State of Palestine (a step taken by Armenia, Ireland, Norway, Slovenia and Spain in recent months, raising the total number of countries recognizing a Palestinian state to 146 of 193 UN members). Payman published her view that “Australia must recognise Palestine” in an opinion piece for the Qatari news outlet Al Jazeera.

As sometimes happens in both political life and its portrayal in the media, the excitement over Payman’s Palestine statements may have prevented a useful assessment of the actual substance and implications of what she has said. I found this to have been the case when I watched Payman’s first speech to parliament again about a year later, and I suggested in a piece of online commentary that, in all the gushy attention to matters of Payman’s appearance and biography, the political vocation conveyed in her speech seemed to have gone unremarked.

The real substance of Payman’s public statements about Palestine in 2024 is not contained in the controversial slogan she put her name to. Instead, the real substance of what Payman has said is in the opportunity it presents for Labor to correlate her statements about Palestinian statehood with Labor’s official position on the matter, as recorded in the party’s National Platform.

Whereas Prime Minister Albanese distinguished Payman’s “inappropriate” remarks from his government’s very clear” and “unequivocal” positions on the Hamas-Israel war, Labor’s official position on Palestinian statehood is a little unclear and a little equivocal. Labor’s 2021 Platform calls on the next Labor Government to recognise Palestine as a state; and expects that this issue will be an important priority for the next Labor Government.

But the updated 2023 Platform (adjusted after the party won government in 2022) has dissociated Labor’s name from the recognition of a Palestinian state, leaving it unclear for what government and for which party this recognition is meant to be a priority. The 2023 Platform records that Labor: Calls on the Australian Government to recognise Palestine as a state; and Expects that this issue will be an important priority for the Australian Government.

If Labor is to include a formal position on Israel and Palestine in its Platform, it would be useful to remove the ambiguity that has crept into this position between 2021 and 2023. Labor could simply remove all reference to the recognition of “Palestine as a state,” and retain only the general statement that Labor “supports the recognition and right of Israel and Palestine to exist as two states within secure and recognised borders.” This statement has not been changed in the 2023 version of the Platform document and is consonant with the widely advocated idea of a “two-state solution” to the Israel/Palestine conflict (an idea that is perhaps safe for any government to advocate in principle because, as some scholars have suggested, it is no longer feasible in practice).

Rather than focusing on the contested vocabulary that Fatima Payman has used, Labor could do something constructive in response to her public statements on Palestine, by removing the ambiguity from its official position on Palestinian statehood, as recorded in its party Platform. There would be no need to announce that this change had been prompted by the challenge Payman has presented to her government; if questioned, Prime Minister Albanese could simply announce that, in the interests of clarity, Labor was amending the wording of its Platform, either to spell out Labor’s position on recognition of a Palestinian state or to omit reference to this divisive matter.

One of the final remarks Fatima Payman made in her first Senate speech was on the importance of “ensuring all voices are heard at the table.” Certainly, she has succeeded in making her voice heard in relation to a matter that is both nationally and internationally divisive – though perhaps her prime minister would prefer she had kept her clear expression of views to matters of cultural harmony, rather than using public speech to draw attention to matters of international politics, and Labor’s own slightly unclear official position on Palestine. Perhaps a general preference would be for Senator Payman to conduct herself as a good and junior Muslim mascot, rather than a bad, if low-level, Muslim menace.

But if attention can be expanded beyond the fact that Senator Payman is a young female Muslim, it might be possible to simply acknowledge these attributes, and then engage with her contributions to public life more objectively and more productively, as the statements of a straight-talking member of parliament. In practice, such expansion of perspective and perception requires not only open-mindedness or good intentions, but also time and energy to be invested in dispassionate debate, especially when matters are divisive, and individual convictions do not accord with party positions.

In the case of Senator Payman, things moved fast after May. Voting to support the recognition of Palestinian statehood required her to cross the floor on June 25, when the Green Party introduced a motion on the matter. The motion was defeated 52-13, but by not voting according to her party’s position, Payman went against Labor party rules, which do not allow members to vote against the party line. Those rules also do not stipulate that crossing the floor will result in expulsion from the party, and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles confirmed the next morning that Senator Payman would not be removed from the party and that it was not the time to be “going around expelling people because they’re expressing a particular opinion.”

The Coalition and Labor had both proposed amendments to the Greens’ motion. Labor’s amendment was broadly in line with the text of its Party Platform, although its language was a little circular. Labor’s amendment endorsed future recognition of a Palestinian state as part of a peace process in support of a two-state solution and a just and enduring peace.” Like the Platform’s generalised support for recognising Palestinian statehood, Labor’s proposed amendment on June 25 was in accordance with broad international support for a just an enduring political solution to the Israel/Palestine conflict.

But perhaps what had impelled Senator Payman to express her views and to vote against her party’s position is the fact that, despite being broad, longstanding, and optimistic, this international consensus does not seem to have contributed to tangible progress in resolving the Israel/Palestine conflict. Recognition of Palestinian statehood may be nothing more than a symbolic statement on the conflict – but it need not be considered intrinsically subversive or against Australia’s national interests.

By breaking ranks with her party on this divisive matter, Payman might be thought overly idealistic, and it remains to be seen how the incident will shape her experience in the Labor party in the weeks and months ahead. But in remarks to the media after the parliamentary motion, she said “I was not elected as a token representative of diversity, I was elected to serve the people of Western Australia” – and her vote on the recognition of Palestine should be understood within the frame of this public parliamentary service, rather than as a matter of mere personal opinion, that is tolerated as if for exceptional reasons. Perhaps in time, the enthusiasm with which the young hijab-wearing Senator was greeted in 2022 will graduate beyond selective affection or tolerance, to become something even more productive; a willingness to discuss complex matters reasonably and without alarmism when they are raised, so that divergent views are neither dismissed, nor appreciated only as tokens of diversity, but are instead considered as substantive contributions to national discussion and debate.

In a parliamentary career of only two years, Fatima Payman has encountered the full spectrum from multicultural appreciation to political controversy. But her public life has only just begun. She will no doubt retain the lessons of this bracing first phase, as she considers how best to pursue the ideals she articulated in her first Senate speech; “to see how much ground I could break, to see how much change I could initiate” – and perhaps to contribute to Australian public life over the long term, drawing on the fundamental Islamic principle of service, that she spoke of in 2022.


Benedict Moleta is a PhD student in international relations at the Australian National University, writing on Coral Bell and Australian foreign policy. His master’s thesis (2020, University of Sydney) was on relations between the European Union and Palestine. His BA was in German and European Studies, with interests from Lessing to Lenin. Benedict is also a singer. Contact via ANU.

More To Explore

What is the concept of sin?

We are born without any sin or sinful conditions. There is no concept of inherited sin in Islam. Similarly, if a child is born with

Privacy Policy

This privacy policy (“Policy”) describes how the Website Operator (“Website Operator”, “we”, “us” or “our”) collects, protects and uses personally identifiable information (“Personal Information”) you (“User”, “you” or “your”) may provide on the website in the course of accessing and using our services (collectively, “Website” or “Services”).

It also describes the choices available to you regarding our use of your Personal Information and how you can access and update this information. This Policy does not apply to the practices of companies/partnerships or otherwise that we do not own or control, or to individuals that we do not employ or manage. The website is directed to users in Australia only.

About the Ahmadiyya Muslim Association

The Ahmadiyya Muslim Assocation (“the Management Association”) promotes social, moral and spiritual well-being. The Management Association is committed to the propogation of the true teachings of Islam through peace and harmony. To promote ‘Love For All and Hatred For None’ and to establish open and honest communication, the Management Association manages and oversees the Muslims Down Under platform (“Muslims Down Under”). Muslims Down Under is an online platform aimed at tackling extremist ideologies and removing misconceptions related to Islam and Muslims.

Automatic collection of information

Our top priority is user data security and, as such, we exercise the no logs policy. We process only minimal user data, only as much as is absolutely necessary to maintain the Website or Services. Information collected automatically is used only to identify potential cases of abuse and establish statistical information regarding Website usage. This statistical information is not otherwise aggregated in such a way that would identify any particular user of the system.

Collection of personal information

You can visit the Website without telling us who you are or revealing any information by which someone could identify you as a specific, identifiable individual. If, however, you wish to use some of the Website’s features, you will be asked to provide certain Personal Information (for example, but not limited to, your name and electronic mail address). We receive and store any information you knowingly provide to us, for example through a blog submission, comment or when you fill in any online forms on the Website. The information collected may include the following:

  • Personal details such as name and country of residence.
  • Contact information such as email address, residential address, and phone numbers.
  • Any other materials you willingly submit to us such as articles, blogs, images, feedback, etc.

You can refuse to provide us with your Personal Information but then you may not be able to take advantage of some of the Website’s features. Users who are uncertain about what information is mandatory are welcome to contact us.

Personal Information and User Comments

The Website offers opportunities to comment and engage in content published. These comments are any actions taken by you that are designed to be visible to other public users. Any information you disclose in comments or other like engagement, along with your screen name and electronic email address, becomes public and may be used by the Website for online or offline promotional use. Should you choose to engage in the comments of the Website you should be aware that any Personal Information you submit can be read, collected and stored by the Website.

The comments that are expressed on blog pages or otherwise, are in no way associated with, or endorsed by, the Website and are held to be the views of the user alone. We are not responsible for the Personal Information you choose to submit in a comment, or otherwise on the Website, and we have no responsibility to publish, take down, remove or edit any of the submissions.

Storing personal information

We will retain and use your Personal Information for the period necessary to comply with our legal obligations, resolve disputes, and enforce our agreements (“retention period”) unless a longer retention period is required or permitted by law. We may use any aggregated data derived from or incorporating your Personal Information after you update or delete it, but not in a manner that would identify you personally. Therefore, the right to access, the right to erasure, the right to rectification and the right to data portability cannot be enforced after the expiration of the retention period.

Use and processing of collected information

In order to make our Website and Services available to you, or to meet a legal obligation, we need to collect and use certain Personal Information. If you do not provide the information that we request, we may not be able to provide you with the requested services. Some of the information we collect is directly from you via our Website. Any of the information we collect from you may be used for the following purposes:

  • Send administrative information
  • Request user feedback
  • Improve user experience
  • Enforce terms and conditions and policies
  • Protect from abuse and malicious users
  • Respond to legal requests and prevent harm
  • Run and operate our Website and Services

Any information collected through webforms will be provided to the Management Association. This information is stored for the purposes as mentioned above and is used only to facilitate further correspondence between you and our platform. As a user you may object to this use but doing so may result in your webform request not being processed.

Processing your Personal Information depends on how you interact with our Website, where you are located in the world and if one of the following applies: (i) You have given your consent for one or more specific purposes; (ii) Provision of information is necessary for the performance of an agreement with you and/or for any pre-contractual obligations thereof; (iii) Processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which you are subject; (iv) Processing is related to a task that is carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in us; (v) Processing is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by us or by a third party.

We will not sell or rent any Personal Information provided to us. Personal Information collected through consent or otherwise will remain in data storage related to this Website only.
Note that legally there is some information we are allowed to process until you object to such processing (by opting out), without having to rely on consent or any other of the following legal bases below. In any case, we will be happy to clarify the specific legal basis that applies to the processing, and in particular whether the provision of Personal Information is a statutory or contractual requirement, or a requirement necessary to enter into a contract.

Information transfer and storage

Depending on your location, data transfers may involve transferring and storing your information in a country other than your own. You are entitled to learn about the legal basis of information transfers to a country outside your own, and about the security measures taken by us to safeguard your information. If any such transfer takes place, you can find out more by checking the relevant sections of this website or inquire with us using the information provided in the contact section.

The rights of users

You may exercise certain rights regarding your information processed by us. In particular, you have the right to do the following: (i) withdraw consent where you have previously given your consent to the processing of your information; (ii) object to the processing of your information if the processing is carried out on a legal basis other than consent; (iii) learn if information is being processed by us, obtain disclosure regarding certain aspects of the processing and obtain a copy of the information undergoing processing; (iv) verify the accuracy of your information and ask for it to be updated or corrected; (v) under certain circumstances, to restrict the processing of your information, in which case, we will not process your information for any purpose other than storing it; (vi) in certain circumstances, to obtain the erasure of your Personal Information from us; (vii) receive your information in a structured, commonly used and machine readable format and, if technically feasible, to have it transmitted to another controller without any hindrance. This provision is applicable provided that your information is processed by automated means and that the processing is based on your consent, on a contract which you are part of or on pre-contractual obligations thereof.

The right to object to processing

Where Personal Information is processed for the public interest, in the exercise of an official authority vested in us or for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by us, you may object to such processing by providing a ground related to your particular situation to justify the objection. You must know that, however, should your Personal Information be processed for direct marketing purposes, you can object to that processing at any time without providing any justification. To learn whether we are processing Personal Information for direct marketing purposes, you may refer to the relevant sections of this document.

How to exercise these rights

Any requests to exercise User rights can be directed to the Owner through the contact details provided on this website. These requests can be exercised free of charge and will be addressed by the Owner as early as possible.

Privacy of children

We do not knowingly collect any Personal Information from children under the age of 13. If you are under the age of 13, please do not submit any Personal Information through our Website or Service. We encourage parents and legal guardians to monitor their children’s Internet usage and to help enforce this Policy by instructing their children never to provide Personal Information through our Website or Service without their permission.
If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 13 has provided Personal Information to us through our Website or Service, please contact us. You must also be at least 18 years of age to consent to the processing of your Personal Information in Australia.


We offer electronic newsletters to which you may voluntarily subscribe at any time. We are committed to keeping your electronic mail address confidential and will not disclose your electronic mail address to any third parties except as allowed in the information use and processing section or for the purposes of utilising a third-party provider to send such emails. We will maintain the information sent via electronic mail in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
You may choose to stop receiving our newsletter or marketing emails by following the unsubscribe instructions included in these emails or by contacting us.


The Website uses “cookies” to help personalise your online experience. A cookie is a text file that is placed on your hard disk by a web page server. Cookies cannot be used to run programs or deliver viruses to your computer. Cookies are uniquely assigned to you, and can only be read by a web server in the domain that issued the cookie to you.
We may use cookies to collect, store, and track information for statistical purposes to operate our Website and Services. You have the ability to accept or decline cookies. Most web browsers automatically accept cookies, but you can usually modify your browser setting to decline cookies if you prefer. To learn more about cookies and how to manage them, visit

Do Not Track signals

Some browsers incorporate a Do Not Track feature that signals to websites you visit that you do not want to have your online activity tracked. Tracking is not the same as using or collecting information in connection with a website. For these purposes, tracking refers to collecting personally identifiable information from consumers who use or visit a website or online service as they move across different websites over time. How browsers communicate the Do Not Track signal is not yet uniform. As a result, this Website is not yet set up to interpret or respond to Do Not Track signals communicated by your browser. Even so, as described in more detail throughout this Policy, we limit our use and collection of your personal information.

Links to other websites

Our Website contains links to other websites that are not owned or controlled by us. Please be aware that we are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other websites or third-parties. We encourage you to be aware when you leave our Website and to read the privacy statements of each and every website that may collect Personal Information.

Information security

We secure information you provide on computer servers in a controlled, secure environment, protected from unauthorised access, use, or disclosure. We maintain reasonable administrative, technical, and physical safeguards in an effort to protect against unauthorised access, use, modification, and disclosure of Personal Information in its control and custody. However, no data transmission over the Internet or wireless network can be guaranteed. Therefore, while we strive to protect your Personal Information, you acknowledge that (i) there are security and privacy limitations of the Internet which are beyond our control; (ii) the security, integrity, and privacy of any and all information and data exchanged between you and our Website cannot be guaranteed; and (iii) any such information and data may be viewed or tampered with in transit by a third-party, despite best efforts.

Data breach

In the event we become aware that there has been unauthorised access to, or unauthorised disclosure of, or loss of, any Personal Information collected by the Website. We reserve the right to take reasonably appropriate measures, including, but not limited to, investigation and reporting, as well as notification to and cooperation with law enforcement authorities. In the event of a data breach, we will make reasonable efforts to notify affected individuals if we believe that the unauthorised access to, or unauthorised disclosure of, or loss of, any of the Personal Information is likely to result in serious harm to the user to whom the Personal Information relates to, or if notice is otherwise required by law. When we do, we will post a notice on the Website and send you an electronic mail.

Legal disclosure

We will disclose any information we collect, use or receive if required or permitted by law, such as to comply with a subpoena, or similar legal processes, and when we believe in good faith that disclosure is necessary to protect our rights, protect your safety or the safety of others, investigate fraud, or to respond to a government request.

Changes and amendments

It is at our discretion to update this Privacy Policy from time to time and will notify you of any material changes to the way in which we treat Personal Information. When changes are made, we will revise the updated date at the bottom of this page. We may also provide notice to you in other ways at our discretion, such as through contact information you have provided. Any updated version of this Privacy Policy will be effective immediately upon the posting of the revised Privacy Policy unless otherwise specified. Your continued use of the Website or Services after the effective date of the revised Privacy Policy (or such other act specified at that time) will constitute your consent to those changes. However, we will not, without your consent, use your Personal Data in a manner materially different than what was stated at the time your Personal Data was collected. Policy was created with WebsitePolicies.

Acceptance of this policy

You acknowledge that you have read this Policy and agree to all its terms and conditions. By using the Website or its Services you agree to be bound by this Policy. If you do not agree to abide by the terms of this Policy, you are not authorised to use or access the Website and its Services.

Contacting us

If you would like further information about this Policy or wish to contact us concerning any matter relating to individual rights and your Personal Information, you may send an email to